Aleman v. Annable’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2007
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dankwardt v. Kermode · Spokane Security Finance Co. v. Bevan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The principal contention has to do with the alleged failure of notice to Aleman of intention to claim lien, such notice being required by the attorney’s lien law. Sections 14 and IS, chapter 14, ’35 C.S.A. A sufficient answer to this contention is that the trial court specifically found that Aleman had actual knowledge of Schaper’s claim, and his counsel admits that there was a conflict of evidence on the point. In these circumstances we are of the opinion that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding and consequently. we do not disturb it.' Where actual notice was had it-was not fatal that Scha'per’s lien was not filed until after the Pelton assignment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.