Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Conn. 413 - Caputo v. Diloretto

Caputo v. Diloretto’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 1986

18 state decisions

40193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacksonville Ry Nav Co v. Hooper · Clarke v. Pierce · Matter of Pirie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether an instrument is under seal or not is a question for the court upon inspection. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The customary phrases, `signed and sealed' or `given under my hand and seal' or some similar phraseology would constitute such a recognition, and the instrument would then be one purporting to be a specialty. The fact that the maker of the instrument himself wrote the word `seal' or the letters `L.S.' after his signature at the time that he executed it, or that the instrument was one whose validity was dependent upon its being under seal, might indicate his intention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “All instruments in writing executed by any person ... purporting and intended to be a specialty or under seal, and not otherwise sealed than by the addition of the word `seal' or the letters `L.S.,' ... shall be deemed in all respects sealed instruments, and received in evidence as such.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.