Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Conn. App. 543 - State v. CARMELO T.

110 Conn. App. 543 - State v. CARMELO T.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart · State v. Reid · Kenny v. Wepman · Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judicial authority shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without first determining, by addressing the defendant personally in open court, that the plea is voluntary and is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from a plea agreement. The judicial authority shall also inquire as to whether the defendant's willingness to plead guilty or nolo contendere results from prior discussions between the prosecuting authority and the defendant or his or her counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The judicial authority shall not accept the plea without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that he or she understands: (1) The nature of the charge to which the plea is offered ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.