Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Conn. App. 778 - State v. Williams

110 Conn. App. 778 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Rhodes (2020), 118 Conn. App. 112 - State v. Bowens (2009)

42 state decisions

170200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Yagow v. United States · Nicholas v. United States · Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Humboldt County et al. · Gregory v. Frontier Materials, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he question of intent is purely a question of fact.... The state of mind of one accused of a crime is often the most significant and, at the same time, the most elusive element of the crime charged.... Because it is practically impossible to know what someone is thinking or intending at any given moment, absent an outright declaration of intent, a person's state of mind is usually proven by circumstantial evidence.... Intent may be and usually is inferred from conduct.... [I]t is not one fact, but the cumulative impact of a multitude of facts which establishes guilt in a case involving circumstantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[t]he defendant's providing a false name to police is verbal conduct that is equivalent to the defendant's refusal to give identification to the police in Aloi , in that it hampered, or hindered, the ability of the police to perform their duties properly, quickly and efficiently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “actual identity to be Corey Williams, not Zeke Williams.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.