Timolat v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““(1) In a portable boring machine, the combination of the boring spindle with a rotary engine, upon the cylinder of which is formed the journal bearing for the boring spindle, as set forth. “(2) In a portable boring machine, the combination of the boring spindle, the rotary engine, with its cylinder, upon which is formed the journal hearing for the boring spindle, the gear connecting the boring spindle and engine shaft, and the feed screw and sleeve nut adapted to turn and force forward the boring tool, as set forth.” ;”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Timolat v. Franklin Boiler Works Co. · Timolat v. Philadelphia Pneumatic Tool Co.

2. ““It employs a reciprocating engine and a fly wheel, and is not portable in the sense that the Moffet drill is portable. It is clamped to the plate which is to be drilled, and has not the thrust, the alignment, the stability, the journal-bearing, or the handles of the Moffet drill.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Timolat v. Franklin Boiler Works Co.