Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.1d 560 - Sutcliff v. Seligman

Sutcliff v. Seligman’s Empirical Analysis

110 F. 560 · 1901

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 1903
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Maghee v. Camden & Amboy Railroad Transportation Co. · Lewis v. Smith · Strong v. United States · Hess v. Newcomer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trip to the former boathouse at 125th street and Harlem river, In order to procure the small boat aud oars needed for coaching purposes, was so germane and Incidental to the express purpose of the charter as to constitute no violation of its general provision.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.