Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 F. 744

In re Levy

Pennsylvania Western District Court · decided 1901-07

<p>Bankruptcy — Composition—Withdrawal of Acceptance by Creditors.</p> <p>Creditors of a bankrupt, wbo have signed an acceptance of an offer of composition, and invoked the action of the court thereon, will not be permitted to withdraw their signatures, where it is not alleged that they were procured by fraud or misrepresentation.</p>

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““These creditors voluntarily' came into court, accepted the proposed composition, and asked the court to act in the matter, and confirm the composition. They procured the court to act, and they are now estopped from interfering with the further conduct of the case in the matter of .this composition. Had they alleged fraud or misrepresentation in the procuring of their signatures to the acceptance, the case would be different. They are presumed to have had the same knowledge when they signed as they have now. The application for their withdrawal will be refused, and the court will proceed to pass upon the merits of the proposed composition. If it is not for the best interests of the creditors, it can be shown on the hearing before the referee.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including In re Agree

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1901-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1969

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

301901191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bankruptcy — Composition—Withdrawal of Acceptance by Creditors.

¶2Creditors of a bankrupt, wbo have signed an acceptance of an offer of composition, and invoked the action of the court thereon, will not be permitted to withdraw their signatures, where it is not alleged that they were procured by fraud or misrepresentation.

¶3In Bankruptcy.

¶4A majority in number and amount of bankrupt’s creditors signed an acceptance of the offer of composition, whereby it was agreed to pay 25 cents on the dollar. Subsequently a number of the creditors who had agreed to accept such composition came into court, and desired to file a paper, asking leave to withdraw their acceptance, and that the application for the composition be dismissed; stating that when they signed the acceptance they were not aware of all the facts in the case.

¶5Way, Walker & Morris, for petitioning creditors.

¶6Spiro & Sachs, for bankrupt.

¶7BUFFINGTON, District Judge

¶8(orally). These creditors voluntarily came into court, accepted the proposed composition, and asked the court to act in the matter, and confirm the composition. They procured the court to act, and they are now estopped from interfering with the further conduct of the case in the matter of this composition, tfad they alleged fraud or misrepresentation in the procuring of their signatures to the acceptance, the case would be different. They are presumed to have had the same knowledge when they signed as they have now. The application for their withdrawal will be refused, and the court will proceed to pass upon' the merits of the proposed composition. If it is not for the best interests of the creditors, it can be shown on the hearing before the referee.

/110/f1d/744 · .json · Public domain