Stolte v. Larkin’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.2d 226 · 1940
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Braden (1956), Giannone v. United States Steel Corp. (1956)
29 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · Langnes v. Green · Kingsbury v. Buckner · Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United States · Elzig v. Gudwangen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this respect the Bakkensen case, supra, seems particularly apposite because there the pleading offered had to do with state ment in a cause of action against both the operator of a street car and the operator of an automobile where, upon death of the automobile driver, a new action was filed against the street car operator alone and in the second action the former pleading was introduced. Here, plaintiff stated a cause against the drivers of two automobiles but on trial virtually abandoned the action against one driver (Smith) and a verdict was directed for that defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garman v. Griffin“That statements in pleadings in the nature of admissions . . . are admissible is established not only in federal courts and in Minnesota, but generally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garman v. Griffin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.