Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.2d 235 - In re Dreshfield

In re Dreshfield’s Empirical Analysis

110 F.2d 235 · 1940

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
March 1965
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1965

70194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Steenbock · In re Ball · In re Sibley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “either by the enumeration of a sufficient number of the members of a group or by other appropriate language, that `the chemicals or chemical combinations'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.