Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.2d 60 - Bache v. Silver Line, Ltd.

Bache v. Silver Line, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

110 F.2d 60 · 1940

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2005

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

701940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New England Coal & Coke Co. v. Northern Barge Corporation · Bank Line, Ltd. v. Porter · The Titania · Toyo Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha v. Wellman · Ketterer v. Armour & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the carriage of goods the trade must always come to some accommodation between ideal perfection of stowage and entire disregard of the safety of the goods; when it has done so, that becomes the standard for that kind of goods. Ordinarily it will not certainly prevent any damage, and both sides know that the goods will be somewhat exposed; but if the shipper wishes more, he must provide for it particularly.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.