Pickett v. Aglinsky’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.2d 628 · 1940
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 1978 · most notably The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United States (1967), United Constructions Workers v. Haislip Baking Co. (1955)
10 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wood v. Carpenter · Hahn v. Claybrook · John Wilcox and Thomas Wilcox v. The Executors of Kemp Plummer · Davis v. Boyett · Capucci v. Barone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The decisions of West Virginia must be followed in the interpretation of this statute; and there can be no question but that, under those decisions, the period of limitation runs from the time when the wrong is committed and the cause of action accrues, and not from plaintiff’s discovery of it.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Every personal action for which no limitation is otherwise prescribed shall be brought: (a) Within two years next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued, if it be for damage to property; (b) within two years next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued if it be for damages for personal injuries; * * Code, 55-2-12.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.