In re Savage’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.2d 680 · 1940
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
July 1969
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on In re Pirani · In re Kluter · In re Dann · In re Duncan · In re Buttolph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We think it proper to observe * * * that the mere fact that a larger number of claims are made than are necessary to cover the invention is not sufficient to warrant rejection upon the ground of undue multiplicity of claims. * * * In re Savage, 110 F.2d 680 , 27 CCPA 1048 (1940).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Flint
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.