Langevin v. Nicolson’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.2d 687 · 1940
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1993
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Deering v. Winona Harvester Works · Duncan Townsite Do v. Lane · Symington Co v. National Malleable Castings Co Miner · United States ex rel. Societe de Condensation et D'Applications Mecaniques v. Coe · Diamond Patent Co. v. S. E. Carr Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e see no reason why a rule relating to the weight of evidence should be applied in an interference case, where priority is involved, different from that applied in an infringement proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. Symsek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.