Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.2d 834 - Dugger v. Cox

Dugger v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

110 F.2d 834 · 1938

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
October 1974
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1974

1019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 192

Relies on Hulse v. Argetsinger · Fifer v. Williams · Jackson v. McIntosh · Whelan v. Blankenbeckler · Gockstetter v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The application to the Court for an order for the sale of assets is a step in the winding up of the affairs of a bank and if such an order be granted, although made by a Court of record of competent jurisdiction, still the funds realized by the sale are not subject to disbursements by the Court, but by the Comptroller, whose agent is in the receiver of the bank. The proceeding in Court for the approval of a sale is ex parte. “The Statute does not contemplate notice to those interested and there are none of the essentials of a controversy, the proceedings lacking judicial characteristics.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Such receiver, under the direction of the comptroller, shall take possession of the books, records, and assets of every description of such association, collect all debts, dues, and claims belonging to it, and upon the order of a court of record of competent jurisdiction, may sell or compound all bad or doubtful debts, and, on a like order, may sell all the real and personal property of such association, on such terms as the court shall direct.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.