Gee v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.3d 1346 · 1997
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Kinder v. Bowersox (2001), Pruett v. Norris (1998)
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Estelle v. McGuire · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court to re-examine state-court determinations [of] state-law questions.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'to deciding whether a conviction violated the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an infirmity in a state post-conviction proceeding does not raise a constitutional issue cognizable in a federal habeas petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.