Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.3d 1480 - Evans v. Chater

Evans v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

110 F.3d 1480 · 1997

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Byam v. Barnhart (2003), United States v. Hughes Aircraft Company (1998)

19 federal appellate · 5 district ·

210199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Marino v. Vasquez · Flaten v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Gonzalez v. Sullivan · Wilson v. A. H. Belo Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “wholly insubstantial, immaterial, or frivolous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Sanders exception applies to any colorable constitutional claim of due process violation that implicates a due process right either to a meaningful opportunity to be heard or to seek reconsideration of an adverse benefits determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The claimant will have established mental incapacity for the purpose of establishing good cause when the evidence establishes that he or she lacked the mental capacity to understand the procedures for requesting review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.