United States v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.3d 457 · 1997
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2012
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stinson v. United States · Chapman v. United States · United States v. Manarite · United States v. Robinson · United States v. Turner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]orming the same intent at two distinct times to commit the same crimes (such as steal from an employer) does not evidence joint planning.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if the defendant can prove that he either 'jointly planned' the crimes or planned one crime that 'would entail the commission of the other as well.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Crimes are not related merely because each was committed with the same purpose”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.