Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 F.3d 60

Docket No. 96-7399.

Thomas v. Witkowski

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 27, 1997. Decided April 3, 1997.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-04-03

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Glenn Calvin Lawhorn, Jr. v. Rufus R. Fleming, Warden Nottoway Correction Al Center

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1997-04-03

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Mansel Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Ronald Keith Wray, II, GIBBES, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Witkowski, No. CA-95-1109-23BD (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 1996). We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/110/f3d/60 · .json · Public domain