110 F3d 61 United States v. Faircloth

110 F.3d 61

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Glenn FAIRCLOTH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-6109.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 27, 1997.
Decided April 4, 1997.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-95-87-BR, CA-96-964-5)

Glenn Faircloth, Appellant Pro Se.

John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders (1) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for bail, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Faircloth, Nos. CR-95-87-BR; CA-96-964-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED