110 F3d 61 United States v. Nasim

110 F.3d 61

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-7002.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
Decided March 24, 1997.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nasim, Nos. CR88-378-HM; CA-96-777-S (D.Md. May 22, 1996). Appellant's motion to remand to the district court is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.