United States v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
110 F.3d 620 · 1997
Citation profile
31 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 433 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 5316 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Liteky et al United States · United States v. Watts · Ratzlaf et Ux United States · Spencer v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court's interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines is a question of law subject to de novo review, while its factual determinations are subject to review only for clear error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.