Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.3d 892 - Aviall, Inc. v. Ryder System, Inc.

Aviall, Inc. v. Ryder System, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

110 F.3d 892 · 1997

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
7
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Dg Acquisition Corp Dg Corp Dg v. Dabah (1998), Gulf Guaranty Life Insurance Company v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (2002)

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

230199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Ryan v. New York Telephone Co. · Fletcher v. Atex, Inc. · Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance · Field v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`other than in a proceeding to confirm or vacate an award, which necessarily occurs after the arbitrator has rendered his service.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] written provision in any ... contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction ... shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Where there has been no review even though an appeal has been taken, it is equivalent to the party not having had an opportunity to appeal, and prevents the challenged decision from becoming the law of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.