Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 F.3d 915 - United States v. Workman

United States v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis

110 F.3d 915 · 1997

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Montano-Figueroa v. Crabtree (1998), United States of America v. Nolan Williams (2001)

7 federal appellate ·

1101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3572 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Carter v. Nesby · City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund · United States v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'eliminates the ... requirement that the specific terms of an installment schedule be fixed by the court. The court is thus able to delegate the responsibility for setting specific terms to a probation officer.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the court provides for payment in installments, the installments shall be in equal monthly payments over the period provided by the court, unless the court establishes another schedule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.