Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 F. App'x 301

Stokes v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-09-15

Decided 2004-09-15

PER CURIAM:

¶1Millis J. Stokes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stokes v. Angelone, No. CA-03-869-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED

/110/fappx/301 · .json · Public domain