Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 FSUPP 836 - Sunbeam Corp. v. MacMillan

Sunbeam Corp. v. MacMillan’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
July 1959
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. · Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp. · Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘That it is the purpose of this Act (amending this section) to protect the rights of States under the United States Constitution to regulate their internal affairs and more particularly to enact statutes and laws, and to adopt policies, which authorize contracts and agreements prescribing minimum or stipulated prices for the resale of commodities and to extend the minimum or stipulated prices prescribed by such contracts and agreements to persons who are not parties thereto. It is the further purpose of this Act to permit such statutes, laws, and public policies to apply to commodities, contracts, agreements, and activities in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.’ ” Section 1, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45 note.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Wilfully and knowingly advertising, offering for sale or selling any commodity at less than the price stipulated in any contract entered into pursuant to the provisions of Sections 102-110, whether the person so advertising, offering for sale’ or selling is or is not a party to such contract, is unfair competition and is actionable at the suit of any person damaged thereby.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.