110 F. Supp. 2d 388 - Sharp v. Artifex, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 360 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360E (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360J (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.