Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 Ga. 290

Sims v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1900

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1900-01-24

<p>Indictment for forgery. Before Judge Candler. Fulton superior court. ' September term, 1899.</p>

Relies on Stephen v. State · Hoskins v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1900-01-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 1990

19 state decisions

901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Simmons, C. J.

¶11. A demurrer to the indictment in a criminal case must be in writing (Penal Code, §950), and when the record in this court shows that such demurrer was not in writing, the trial judge will not be reversed for overruling it upon that ground.

¶22. “Offenses differing from each other and varying in their punishment may be included in the same indictment and tried at the same time, provided they be of the same nature and differ only in degree; as, for *291instance, the forging of an instrument and the uttering and publishing it as true, knowing it to be false." Hoskins v. State, 11 Ga. 92. In such case the State will not be put to an election. Stephen v. State, 11 Ga. 231.

Submitted December 18, 1899.Decided January 24, 1900.Indictment for forgery. Before Judge Candler. Fulton superior court. ' September term, 1899.B. C. Burkhart, S. C. Crane, and J. L. Cobb, for plaintiff in error. C. D. Hill, solicitor-general, contra.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.
/110/ga/290 · .json · Public domain