Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Idaho 163 - State v. Stuart

State v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Card (1991), State v. Timothy Alan Dunlap (2013)

4 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

18019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · State v. Garcia · State v. Haggard · State v. Osborn · State v. Scroggins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant also argues that ... I.C. § 18-4001, and I.C. § 18-4003, should be read to contemplate the existence of a second degree murder by torture offense, and thus the trial court should have instructed the jury on second degree murder pursuant to its duty to instruct on lesser included offenses. We note that a second degree murder instruction was given, but a second degree murder by torture instruction was not requested or given. In addition, we note that appellant’s counsel accepted the instructions as given by the court, and noted that he had no objection to the instructions the court intended to give. Thus, any error in failing to instruct on this charge, if indeed one exists, was invited error and will not be considered on appeal. State v. Lopez, 100 Idaho 99 , 593 P.2d 1003 (1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.