Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 IDAHO 762 - J.R. Simplot Co. v. State

J.R. Simplot Co. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2011

8 state decisions

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Employment Security Agency · Swayne v. Department of Employment · Department of Employment v. Bake Young Realty · Larsen v. State, Dept. of Employment · Department of Employment v. Brown Brothers Construction, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... extends to the details of the work, the manner, method or mode of doing it, the means by which it is to be accomplished, or, specifically, the details, manner, means, or method of doing the work, as contrasted with the result thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Hence, we hold that the peremptory termination of a relationship continues to be only one of many factors to be considered, and in any case is of diminished validity standing by itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1. Whether the worker has authority to hire subordinates; 2. Whether the worker owns major items of equipment or incurs substantial unreimbursed expenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.