110 Ind. App. 264 - Daugherty v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1994
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Clark · Swanson v. Slagal, Administratrix · Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Armuth · Saliba v. Saliba · 96 Ind. App. 15 - Munson v. Rupker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... a person to anticipate and guard against what usually happens or is likely to happen, and that a failure to do this is negligence; but that reasonable care does not require him to foresee and guard against that which is unusual and not likely to occur, and a failure to do this is not negligence."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.