110 Ind. App. 290 - Ringenberg v. Ringenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1962
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parkison v. Thompson · Davis v. Davis · 109 Ind. App. 350 - Radabaugh v. Radabaugh · Cirtin v. Cirtin · State Life Insurance Co. v. Cast
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That clause of §3-1216, Burns’ 1933, §923, Baldwin’s 1934, which provides for allowances to the wife 'pending a petition for divorce,’ refers to that period of time intervening between the commencement of the action and the rendition of final judgment by the trial court. Cirtin v. Cirtin (1928), 199 Ind. 737 , 164 N. E. 493 ; Davis v. Davis (1895), 141 Ind. 367 , 40 N. E. 803 . In cases of this kind, where the wife is denied a divorce and one is granted the husband, the statute does not provide for allowances pending an appeal. Appellant’s petition for allowances pending appeal was properly denied.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.