Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 KAN 191 - Upton v. Pendry

Upton v. Pendry’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1965
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1965

6 state decisions

3019221930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wideman v. Faivre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This court is not trying this lawsuit; its jurisdiction is limited to a review of errors alleged to have been made by the district court which did try this lawsuit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.