Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 KAN 292 - Denton v. Miller

Denton v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
10
states following
June 1974
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 1974

24 state decisions — followed in 10 states

60192219301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Intoxicating-Liquor Cases · Dreyer v. Schrick · Riley v. Day · Parnell v. Thompson · Carr v. Catlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The probate court being with respect to the subject involved one of general jurisdiction, the failure of the record to show affirmatively the existence of facts necessary to the jurisdiction undertaken to be exercised is not sufficient to defeat it upon a collateral attack; in case the record is merely silent the presumption is that the jurisdictional facts existed. (23 Cyc. 1078.)” (p. 294.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““While probate courts are sometimes spoken of as courts of limited jurisdiction, they have jurisdiction over certain peculiar, exclusive subjects, and their jurisdiction is limited only in the sense that it is confined to the particular subject matter, but within their province they are courts of general jurisdiction. (Parnell v. Thompson, 81 Kan. 119, 132 , 105 Pac. 502 .)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““If a showing with respect to the child’s father was needed, it was supplied by a recital in a paper filed by the mother at the time of the proceedings that the child had no known relatives except herself.” (p. 294.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.