McAuley v. Siscoe’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. · Enright v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Huber Manufacturing Co. v. Claudel · Wilkes v. Clark · Chanute Window Glass Co. v. Pierce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Modern ways of doing business and modern inventions have necessarily modified the rigidity of ancient rules of evidence touching correspondence.” (McAuley v. Siscoe, 110 Kan. 804, 807 , 205 Pac. 346 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.