Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 LA 61 - Sharp v. Zeller

Sharp v. Zeller’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Kittredge v. Grau (1925), Sanderson v. Frost (1941)

56 state decisions

12019021910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Burke · Durham v. Williams · 44 La. Ann. 1032 - Hero v. Bloch · 36 La. Ann. 819 - Moore v. Stancel · Joffrion v. Bordelon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The district judge rendered judgment in favor of the defendant Henry Zeller for $3,900. This amount was evidently made up of the sum of $2,900, amount of the proceeds of the sale of his three pieces of separate estate, applied to the use and benefit of the community, and the sum of $1,000, placed in the hands of his wife for safe-keeping, and claimed not to have been returned by her.” 110 La. 74 , 34 South. 134 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"We think that Zeller was authorized to apply the rents of the property mortgaged to the payment of the children, using only the balance as profits for the benefit of the community. Civ. Code, art. 2402."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an uncertain, floating title, neither advisable nor permissible”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.