Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 MO 546 - Hawkins v. McGroarty

Hawkins v. McGroarty’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
May 1914
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1914

12 state decisions

70189219001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Despatch Line of Packets v. Bellamy Man. Co. · Palmer v. Williams · Pollard & Co. v. Gibbs · Ragan v. Chenault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the statute as it now reads, requiring written authority for the contract which the agents mcJce, there can be no question, it would seem, that there was no such ratification here as could, by any process of reasoning, bind the defendant Maull to specifically perform the contract in question, which his agent Heimans had no written authority to make.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.