Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Mont. 300 - Cross v. Cross

Cross v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1984

7 state decisions

4019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 39 Cal. App. 177 - Johnson v. Alexander · Lessert v. Lessert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.“The question then is: Does the consent of the parent under the Idaho statute, in order to make the marriage valid, have to be written and acknowledged as provided in section 31-202, supra, [essentially similar to sec. 5712, Rev. Codes of Montana] or is the marriage valid where the parents had actually consented even though the consent was not written? “The requirement of written and acknowledged consent, as required by section 31-202 of the Idaho Laws, supra, has been held in cases considering similar statutes to be applicable only to the issuance of the license, and simply directory to the clerk who issues the license, and the lack of such written and acknowledged consent does not affect the validity of the marriage.” (Citing cases.) See also, 35 Am. Jur., sec. 23, p. 195; 38 C. J., secs. 73, 74, pp. 1306, 1307; Vaughn v. Vaughn, 62 Cal. App. (2d) 260, 144 Pac. (2d) 658 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““1. That the party in whose behalf it is sought to have the marriage annulled was under the age of legal consent, and such marriage was contracted without the consent of his or her parents or guardian, or person having charge of him or her; unless, after attaining the age of consent, such party for any time freely cohabited with the other as husband or -wife. * * #””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all marriages contracted without the state, which would be valid by the laws of the country in which the same were contracted, are valid in this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.