Commonwealth v. Jeannis’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Commonwealth v. Torres · Rodriques v. Furtado · 31 Va. App. 447 - Hughes v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). To conduct that analysis, we must first review the constitutional principles that apply to strip searches, visual body cavity searches, and manual body cavity searches. 1. Strip searches, visual body cavity searches, and manual body cavity searches . A strip search occurs when”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“PER REVERE [POLICE DEPARTMENT] [PATIENT] HAS BEEN ARRESTED, HAD BEEN FOUND TO HAVE BAGS OF TIGHTLY WRAPPED CRACK COCAINE AND HEROIN (SEPARATELY) HIDDEN IN HIS RECTUM.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there was heightened probable cause to believe that the bag protruding from the defendant's rectum contained contraband,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.