Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 NEV 706 - Starr v. Rousselet

Starr v. Rousselet’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McKissick v. McKissick · Edmonds v. Perry · Weinstein v. Sodaro · Newitt v. Dawe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a simple reference to a 'joint' account . . . will not suffice for purposes of establishing a joint tenancy”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in the name of the depositor and one or more other persons.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Deposits in names of two or more persons”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.