Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 N.M. 131 - Comstock v. Mitchell

Comstock v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Romero v. Mervyn's · Vickers v. North American Land Developments, Inc. · Chevron Oil Co. v. Sutton Ex Rel. Sutton · Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n · Echols v. NC Ribble Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The information received by the third person may come directly from the principal by letter or word of mouth, from authorized statements of the agent, from documents or other indicia of authority given by the principal to the agent....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I wish to emphasize that apparent authority must emanate from the conduct of the person to be charged as principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]pparent authority arises from the principal's manifestations to third parties....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.