State v. McGuire’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 93 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Swafford v. State (1991), Herron v. State (1991)
5 federal appellate · 93 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Irvin v. Dowd · Missouri v. Hunter · Dobbert v. Florida · Grady v. Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nce defendant restrained the victim with the requisite intent to hold her for service against her will ... although the kidnapping continued throughout the course of defendant's other crimes”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bernal v. Lytle · State v. Jacobs“The issue on which the state and defendant differ is whether the state relied on identical facts to convict defendant of both offenses in this case. * * * * * * Defendant confuses the use of the same facts to prove successive offenses that depend on separate conduct with the use of the same facts to prove concurrent offenses that depend on the same conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bachicha“[P]roof of the commission of one crime by evidence that proves commission of another may constitute double jeopardy only when, given the elements of each crime, the one crime could not have been committed without the commission of the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bernal v. Lytle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.