Maples v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Parish (1994), State v. Belanger (2009)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2071
Relies on County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · State v. Roy · Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Bliss v. Greenwood · State v. Herrera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should be decided by referring to the purpose of the particular statute and the extent of intrusion upon the courts' ability to discharge their functions, not by categorizing the rule as either `substantive' or `procedural.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. House“`Where ... there are two possible interpretations relating to the right to an appeal, that interpretation which permits a review on the merits rather than rigidly restricting appellate review should be favored.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Supreme Court Rule 12-601 is the controlling rule in appeals from Workers' Compensation actions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.