Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 N.M. 486 - State v. Whitaker

State v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably State v. Dominguez (1993), State v. Arellano (1997)

36 state decisions

280199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · Williams v. Illinois · Tate v. Short · Poland v. Arizona · Morris v. Schoonfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the original judge would reasonably be expected upon remand to have substantial difficulty in putting out of his or her mind previously-expressed views or findings determined to be erroneous or based on evidence that must be rejected, (2) whether reassignment is advisable to preserve the appearance of justice, and (3) whether reassignment would entail waste and duplication out of proportion to any gain in preserving the appearance of fairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Larceny consists of the stealing of anything of value which belongs to another. Who ever commits larceny when the property of value stolen is a firearm is guilty of a fourth degree felony when its value is less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.