Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 N.M. 525 - State v. Stephens

State v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gonzales · People v. Viduya · State v. Masters · State v. Tapia · State v. McKinley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are clearly of the opinion that where the original taking of the thing, upon which the charge of larceny is predicated, was at a place without the jurisdiction of the trial court, but within the state, and the thing was brought into the county within its jurisdiction, the intent to seal [sic] continuing, the thief carrying away the goods becomes guilty of a complete larceny in every county or locality into which he takes them while his intent to steal continues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.