Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 N.W.2d 421 - Hendricks v. Porter

Hendricks v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2025

12 state decisions

601961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaplain v. Grubb · Johnson v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * while the decision of the trial court is entitled to appreciable weight, it is the duty of this court to carefully review and analyze the evidence, and to render a just decision based on the evidence in the case. * * * ” Hendricks v. Porter, N.D., 110 N.W.2d 421 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.