Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 N.Y. 519 - Leslie v. . Lorillard

Leslie v. . Lorillard’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

146
cited by 146 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 113 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 146 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1978 · most notably United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n (1897), Addyston Pipe Steel Company v. United States (1899)

6 federal appellate · 113 state decisions — followed in 19 states

4401888189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hawes v. Oakland · Diamond Match Co. v. . Roeber · McHenry v. . Hazard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In actions by stockholders which assail the acts of their directors or trustees, courts will not interfere unless the powers have been illegally or unconscientiousfy executed, or unless it be made to appear that the acts were fraudulent or collusive, and destructive of the rights of the stockholders. Mere errors of judgment are not sufficient as grounds for equity interference, for the powers of those entrusted with corporate management are largely discretionary.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ Or such a fraudulent transaction completed or contemplated by the acting managers, in connection with some other party, or among themselves, or with other shareholders as will result in serious injury to the corporation, or to the interests of the other shareholders, “ Or where the board of directors, or a majority of them, are acting for their own interest, in a manner destructive of the corporation itself, or of the rights of the other shareholders.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.