Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Ohio App. 3d 137 - State v. Jackson

110 Ohio App. 3d 137 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. O'NEILL (2003), 148 Wash. 2d 564 - State v. O'Neill (2003)

25 state decisions

1401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]y the time Officer David asked appellant for permission to search the car, he had identified the occupants of the vehicle and found no other indicia of criminal conduct. While the officer's first request for such a search might be considered as ordinary police work, once such a request is clearly and definitively denied, the encounter begins to take on a coercive tone. In this case, the officer and appellant engaged in a prolonged colloquy on the issue of police power to search a vehicle. During this time, appellant repeatedly refused the officer permission to search. Yet the officer continued in his pursuit to obtain appellant's consent. It was not until the specter of a search warrant was raised that appellant acquiesced to the search.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ut there is also the possibility of obtaining a search warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.