110 Ohio App. 3d 165 - State v. Peek’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2018
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Deem · 54 Ohio St. 2d 380 - State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'Connor · State ex rel. Leis v. Gusweiler · 55 Ohio App. 3d 102 - State v. Rader
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court erred by finding appellant guilty of the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle under R.C. 2913.03 . Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle is not, and cannot be, the lesser included offense of receiving stolen property, R.C. 2913.51.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.