Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Ohio App. 3d 342 - Lewis v. Blair

110 Ohio App. 3d 342 - Lewis v. Blair’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2022

8 state decisions

301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. · Strack v. Pelton · 39 Ohio App. 2d 97 - Adomeit v. Baltimore · Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. Lohman · Scholler v. Scholler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party cannot convert a Civ. R. 60(B)(3) motion into a Civ. R. 60(B)(5) motion merely by characterizing conduct as fraud upon the court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.