110 Ohio App. 3d 408 - State v. Derugen’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably State v. Helfrich (2018), State v. Miller, Unpublished Decision (11-9-2006) (2006)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 64 Ohio App. 2d 141 - State v. Thomas · 13 Ohio App. 3d 456 - State v. Petrou · 90 Ohio App. 3d 479 - State v. McGinnis · 52 Ohio App. 2d 315 - State v. Penn · 20 Ohio App. 3d 277 - State v. Saltzer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`First Offender' means anyone who has been convicted of an offense in this state or any other jurisdiction and who previously or subsequently has not been convicted of the same or a different offense in this state or any other jurisdiction. When two or more convictions result from or are connected with the same act or result from offenses committed at the same time, they shall be counted as one conviction. * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the expungement statute[s are] 'designed to recognize that individuals with a single criminal infraction may be rehabilitated,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clemens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.